Panda announces Milestone Asset in the Asset Tracking – More than $ 2.two billion in assets tracked

Frisco, TX (PRWEB) February 23, 2014

Asset Panda, LLC, a developer of asset management and tracking computer software primarily based in Frisco, TX, today announced a new milestone in asset tracking, to a lot more than $ two.2 billion in total assets tracked.

Asset Panda is the easiest mobile technique far more intuitive to track and handle your assets. Pandas active program uses mobile scanning applications integrated barcode. This indicates that any person with a mobile phone may possibly conduct audits or gear research in the field and you do not require to buy pricey scanners dedicated bar code.

Asset Panda can retailer data in types such as bar codes, videos, pictures, recipes and rental and warranty. These information are stored and managed in the cloud, where it is protected and accessible via any web browser and mobile devices, no matter exactly where users are.

stocks of assets being monitored with panda assets consist of all sorts of fixed assets, such as tools, gear, components, telephones, computer systems and other computer sources, furnishings office leases, stocks, art, collectibles and individual home.

Asset Panda is generally employed for spreadsheets utilized to replace or sustain stocks of assets, or in addition to monetary / accounting systems that have the capacity to handle assets and restricted comply with-up.

are some common examples of use cases where users benefit from genuine pandas special tracking capabilities

???????? Tools for field repairs
???? Oil and gas extraction equipment and services
???? Machinery and construction tools
???? Transportable Healthcare Gear
???? Audiovisual gear
???? Analytical testing equipment and machines
???? Tablets and laptops

Asset Panda is a method of inventory, it offers comprehensive life cycle management of the assets of your organization. Asset Panda manages, organizes, supervises and monitors all transactions and activities that take place throughout the life of an asset, which includes repairs and sales and billing.


Asset pandas to the following customers:

???????? Easy item entry, recording, reporting and verification
???? Keep all important information about an asset in a single place
???? Access anytime, anywhere mobile or internet
???? The rapid deployment price
???? Eliminates the want for a separate device code bars
???? Backup data securely (Amazon Cloud)

Typically, customers active pandas can save 1-three % of their total asset value of the assets Panda. For instance, for a business of ten,000 assets and $ 750 average. worth of assets ($ 7.5 million total asset worth), they can save much more than $ 100K/yr implementation of active Panda. You can calculate your savings from active pandas return on investment calculator page/roi this link.

Asset Panda provides a simple way to solve their largest dilemma tracking and management of details assets they hold organizations. A lot more details is available in the active pandas internet site.

clear = “all” audit Press Service

Q&A: what are the positive aspects of assets securitisation?

Query by Abuni J: what are the benefits of assets securitisation?

Very best answer:

Answer by I didn’t do it!
There are several benefits. To name just a few in a nutshell:
Securitization can enhance return on capital for the originator by converting on-balance sheet loans into an off-balance sheet fee income stream that attracts significantly less capital. It also improves asset and liability management as properly as credit threat management. In particular, by transforming illiquid assets into tradable instruments, the value of the threat is determined by market place forces instead of a theoretical valuation. By way of securitization, credit threat can be transferred from one particular entity to yet another, allowing a far better optimization of an individual utility function in terms of risk/return preference.
Payment streams from secritized assets can be structured to meet the certain requirements of investors, and most importantly, structural credit enhancements and diversified asset pools (e.g. in CDOs) do not demand that the investor requirements a detailed understanding of the underlying assets (e.g. in securitized credit card receivables).
Overall, asset scuritization has lowered the cost and elevated the efficiency of the borrow/loan markets significantly.

Add your own answer in the comments!

what are the primary functions of assets securitisation?

Query by Abuni J: what are the major attributes of assets securitisation?

Greatest answer:

Answer by Countessa
Assets securitization in banks and economic institutions. The procedure of securitization exists in two simple forms as the balance and outdoors-balance securitization. The paper is specifically focused on the outside-balance securitization. Contemporary types of financial resources industry mobilisation refer to the basis of processes, subjects of securitization, technical and economical context, conditions, benefits and sensible implementation. Asset securitisation was very first used in the USA

What do you feel? Answer under!

Explain how AAA assets may be created from pools of risky mortgages?

Question by : Explain how AAA assets may be created from pools of risky mortgages?
Explain how AAA assets may be created from pools of risky
mortgages each of which individually may be rated as riskier than
AAA. When so many AAA securities defaulted was it because the rat-
ing agencies were corrupt, incompetent or unlucky? To what extent
was this process of the creation of structured products responsible
for the 2007 …financial crisis?

Best answer:

Answer by I didn’t do it!
The process is known as ‘credit enhancement’. There are various ways how this can be achieved.

For example, a Company A whose overall credit rating is BB sells its assets to a special purpose vehicle (SPV). The SPV funds the purchase of these assets by issuing asset backed securities to investors. The investors rely on the performance of the particular assets in the SPV and not on the performance of Company A; and this is a major difference: if the transaction is properly structured, a bankruptcy of Company A will not interfere with the payments of the assets, now isolated from the BB rated company. A rating agency, for example Standard & Poors, rate the ability of the company to pay their debt. If the assets are held in an SPV, isolated from Company A with its BB rating, the SPV can have a higher rating if the assets are considered good quality. If this is not sufficient, a bank may issue some form of guarantee, for example a letter of credit issued by a bank for a fee, which guarantees the payment.

Another argument for risk reduction goes as follows: diversifying the risks by pooling and repackaging them into a series of bonds, would reduce the overall risk. For example, the total potential loss amount is higher if you are exposed to the mortgage of one borrower, than if you are exposed to two or more borrowers for the same amount: it is less likely that all different borrowers default at the same time.

However, there is one major flaw, among others, in this concept, which proved to be fatal in the recent financial crises: the buyers of securitized debt instruments do no longer have transparency and understanding of the underlying risks of the instrument that they hold. A holder of a bond which is the result of securitized credit card receivables, for example, does not need to and cannot have a complete understanding of the credit quality of the individual credit card debt that makes up the bond. All he relies on is an abstract mathematical concept of aggregate default probability, which is partly the result of a rating issued by a rating agency exposed to a potential conflict of interest: the rating agencies had an incenticve to issue high ratings because they were paid by the issuer (risk of moral hazard!).

In summary: in theory, securitization of credit should result in a reduction in the overall risk through diversification, compared to the individual components of the asset pool. However, this risk reduction was more than offset through the risk of mispricing the individual risk component and the risk of moral hazard in the origination of these instruments. All this made such instruments much more vulnerable to external shocks, such as an interest rate hike, which ultimately led to the recent collapse of the financial markets.

The securitization of credit and the mispricing of the risks did significantly contribute to the financial crisis, although on their own they would not have been sufficient; other ingredients, such as regulatory imprudence or massive capital inflows into the economy were necessary to create a financial crisis of such a magnitude.

What do you think? Answer below!